Drug factory · FDA FEI 3008927689
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
1881 East Road, Unit 1903, Houston, TX, United States
Problems found, fixed voluntarily at FDA's last inspection, Feb 24, 2026.
Voluntary Action Indicated: inspectors found problems, but not serious enough for FDA to take action. The company is expected to fix them.
4 drug inspections on record since 2013: 1 with no problems, 3 with problems fixed voluntarily, 0 with FDA action.
What it does, for whom
| Drug | Role | For | NDC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fludeoxyglucose F-18 | Makes it | The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | 60215-411 |
FDA inspection history
| Ended | Result | Program | Problems noted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026 | Problems found, fixed voluntarily | Drug Quality Assurance | 4 |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Problems found, fixed voluntarily | Bioresearch Monitoring | 3 |
| Jul 25, 2016 | No problems found | Drug Quality Assurance | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | Problems found, fixed voluntarily | Drug Quality Assurance | — |
What inspectors wrote down
From FDA's Form 483 citations: conditions an investigator observed that may violate drug manufacturing rules, as FDA published them.
Feb 24, 2026 inspection
- Oversight of production operations 21 CFR 212.20(a)
You did not oversee production operations in a manner to ensure that each PET drug meets the quality and purity characteristics that it is supposed to have. - Orderly handling, prevention of mix-ups, prevention of contamination 21 CFR 212.30(a)
Your facilities are not adequate to ensure the prevention of contamination of equipment or product by substances, personnel, or environmental conditions that could reasonably be expected to have an adverse effect on product quality. - Adequate controls (general) 21 CFR 212.50
Your firm lacks adequate production and process controls to ensure the consistent production of a PET drug that meets the applicable standards of identity, strength, quality and purity. - ID of major equipment 21 CFR 212.50(c)(7)
Your batch production record did not include the identification of major pieces of equipment used in production of the batch.
Mar 20, 2018 inspection
- Failure to develop written procedures 21 CFR 314.80(b)
Written procedures have not been developed for the evaluation of post marketing adverse drug experiences. - Late submission of quarterly safety reports 21 CFR 314.80(c)(2)
Not all quarterly periodic adverse drug experience reports have been submitted within 30 days of the close of the quarter. - Timely submission 21 CFR 314.81(b)(2)
An annual report was not submitted within 60 days of the anniversary date of U.S. approval of the application to the FDA division responsible for reviewing the application.
Registered with FDA for: positron emission tomography drug production.